APS and its editors are aware of concerns with “Declines in Religiosity Predict Increases in Violent Crime—but Not Among Countries With Relatively High Average IQ,” & are examining the article & review process. We welcome all comments/criticisms psci@psychologicalscience.org
I remember when @PsychScience was formed in 1988 because @APA had moved too far away from objective scientific inquiry.
This kind of gutless, craven behavior will force real psychological scientists to abandon @PsychScience & form yet another a new society for the same reasons.
-
-
There are quite serious methodological and statistical flaws in this paper. Revisiting published work in light of that is the part of scientific inquiry that lets us claim it’s occasionally self correcting. To not subject published work to scrutiny would be gutless and craven.
-
Publishing a new paper is fine, but speaking as an editor, it will do little to correct deficiencies in the review process if they exist (to be determined). There's nothing wrong with a journal taking a look at its process when significant concerns about the data are pointed out.
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
“Real psychological scientists” value methodological rigour and close scrutiny of data. Unlike yourself.
-
We've both published plenty & been cited plenty, according to Google Scholar. Your bird song research looks cool. You can't do better than a cheap ad hominem?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Hope fully the light of science will live on in East Asia. The west is entering into another dark age.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
You can always join the Ulster Institute. Maybe Lynn will let you publish an article or two in that journal that he runs as a vanity press.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@primalpoly they accepted comments/criticism how is that SJW tactic. Gutless would be to cave in to those demands but their engaging by asking how they can improve. I'm not sure u are.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.