Exactly. I don't have strong opinions on which norms are best, but they are strikingly different!
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
- 1 more reply
-
-
-
Dunno, and I am not defending social science, but back to Physics and you can go and copy paste Astronomy papers, almost, as long as you apply it to a new star. Is it productive? Don't conflate quantity with quality.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you read papers in the leading journals of sociology and psychology, they seem very different. ASR/AJS papers tend to be involved discussions of 'here's how this major theory should change, and here's empirical evidence' while top psych papers tend to be smaller in scope.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Psych is a guessing game. Math is knowing. Lots to say when one is guessing, therefore the plethora of papers better suited for the loo.
End of conversation
-
-
-
But does 17 journal papers... Do they replicate, bro?
-
*But those 17 journal papers... Do they replicate, bro?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Goodharting risk: High
-
Not that I have any clue what would be a *better* metric to track for a young professor-hopeful.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.