This, without the unnecessary “self-righteous” bit. Any human in that situation would count the same for this argument.
Also, don't call it a 'conspiracy theory' if powerful, motivated, self-righteous people are known to have met & discussed how to handle a threatening situation, under conditions of confidentiality & plausible deniability.https://twitter.com/BretWeinstein/status/1262480202124283904 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But do call it a conspiracy theory if the "hypothesis" presumes the results were all decided by people and there were no elements of luck, randomness, or unforseen outcomes. That doesn't happen with complex systems- ever.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If powerful people met to discuss what to do it’s no longer a conspiracy theory, it’s a conspiracy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“Threatening situation”, what would you have done?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Too highfalutin for me. When powerful government enforment executives work in coordination with each other to protect our democracy knowing they have no predicate to justify their actions, I’d simply call it a coup attempt.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.