You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
We could, if we wanted, transfer to a "deliberative democracy" where citizens are informed before votes. But hmmm... I wonder which side of the aisle would prevent this?
Both sides tend to dismiss whatever science doesn't accord with their preconceived world-views, sadly. One tends to dismiss climate science & epidemiology; the other tends to dismiss behavior genetics, intelligence research, evolutionary psychology, etc.
True, and the science denied on the right pertains to more serious, existential issues, such as climate change (isn't that this thread?) At this moment the moral choice is pretty clear. Once we have a decent climate response, then the left's weaknesses become more pressing.
Science denial on the left includes paranoia about nuclear power, which is one of the few peacock things we can do that will have a big impact on ghg emissions. It will also lower pollution.
“behavior genetics” lol couldn’t even wait a few hours before unbuckling his belt and starting in with the eugenics pseudo-science apologism
Yep. There are scirhce deniers on both sides of the aisle
One side ignores the overwhelming consensus of relatively hard science while the other tends to disagree with one particular side of arguments in relatively soft sciences over which much controversy remains. These things are not the same. Also, I loved "Spent" & enjoy EvoPsych.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
