Lots of these replies basically boil down to 'Citizens shouldn't be expected to know _any_ details about a major public policy issue that's been the object of an intense partisan Culture War for decades.' So why have a democracy at all?
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Or maybe take a shot at charity and empathy rather than condescension and pedantry?
-
Empathy for cheap-talk virtue-signaling is how civilization fails.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Citizens don't have to become policy wonks in order for them to care about an issue and vote that way. Ideally, we wouldn't also have quasi-deniers and what-abouters defying the overwhelming bulk of climate scientists. Their ignorance is a lot more dangerous.
-
Why have democracy at all if citizens just defer to 'experts' & 'journalists'?
- 7 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I can't wait to hear about how this question goes over on dates.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Please talk to an actual climate scientist before dispensing “pro tips”, because this one is wrong. FYI: Several National Academy of Sciences studies have shown this is likely not a big issue, and other things are far more important.
-
So your point is, if people talk about climate science in public, they should know what they're talking about. I was making exactly the same point. Glad that we agree!
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This is a fair point relating to people having no actual knowledge about issues they claim to care about. But bad faith actors use this real issue - many on the left don't know what they're talking about - to pretend climate change isn't a real concern. And it is a huge concern.
-
It is a legit concern, but there are many other legit concerns that get far less airtime.
- 4 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.