Experts think humanity faces a 10-20% chance in this century of suffering a catastrophe that drives our species extinct forever. _If this estimate is right_, what % of gross world product (GWP) would it be reasonable to spend each year to reduce this risk to less than 2%?
-
-
that 1/6 number is fantasy no way to ground that in any kind of reality. you can make up anything you want there.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If the quoted probability range were 1-2%, would that change people's willingness to allocate funds? It would be informative to rerun the poll with an order-of-magnitude lower estimate to gauge probability sensitivity in your sample.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“bad AI” .... probly not the same as that shit running my pandora station I guess
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm working my way through the book as well from your earlier recommendation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Wait that is not extinction
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I call bullshit on that. And as we go forward, chance of a complete extinction will decrease. Ask Elon.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No amount of predicted anthropogenic global warming can give us EXCINCTION FFS. Check how many degrees you need to make Siberia not habitable
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
"Experts". Because they have so much experience with planetary extinction events. Comical. Faculty lounge speculation.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.