Bullying is something we do when we scared. Then if there is someone in our environment who uses bullying and gains something by doing it, we will (unconsciously) see that behavior as successful and copy it.
-
-
-
That's exactly the hypothesis that is empirically refuted by this research.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I think
@itsbirdemic will probably have some critiques of the equivalence of "heritability" and "grounded in the genes" -
blocked unfortunately but you bet I do! Although "grounded in genes" is vague. High heritability doesn't imply a lack of malleability or a lack of environmental contribution to a trait. It's pretty much only useful in the context of highly controlled plant and animal breeding
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
@DegenRolf I'm not sure what the "anti-bullying program" was, but in my school, it was a "0 tolerance policy for physical violence". So, if you fought back you got suspended, and if you didn't and ratted, the bully would lie and say "He hit me too", and you got suspended. -
Bullies didn't care about their academic record, and victims did, so the school essentially forced all of the victims to lie about the behavior. They called it "anti-bullying", but it was an institutional reinforcement. Felt like a hell specifically designed to torture nerds.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Odoyle Rules!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
How do you define bullying? Is this synonymous to domestic violence or different?
-
Surely, regardless of genetic predisposition, an individual raised in an abusive family would have worse outcomes than the same genetically predisposed individual raised in a healthy family?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.