We ignored the flu every year, even though thousands died. Now, we want zero tolerance for public health. Will we see it differently in the future, or just slide back to the status quo if the media doesn't scream about flu deaths three years from now?
-
-
-
People somehow think that a few million is a larger number than a few thousand. when will they learn?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Remember, as you consider these things, that temporary government programs are never temporary.
-
“This is a tremendous opportunity to restructure things to fit our vision,” Majority Whip James Clyburn (D-S.C.) told lawmakers, according to a source on the call.https://thehill.com/homenews/house/488543-house-democrats-eyeing-much-broader-phase-3-stimulus …
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Discussing heartbreaking tradeoffs is bad signaling, It portrays you like a cold-hearted pragmatist and not as a positive-can-do idealist which people love so much WE CAN SAVE EVERYONE AND THE ECONOMY TOO Things need to get much worse before pragmatism will be accepted
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It’s pretty clear vast numbers of us are not rational. I’ve always known Freud got that one right but what we are witnessing is mind boggling. Success has lead to decadence. The herd is too fat & too happy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there literally a single place outside Italy where we are more than 20% above a high flu season, in terms og elder mortality? Are the February numbers out yet?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Can you cite that study, or anything pointing to it - sounds like a must read.
- 6 more replies
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.