(Early) Friday physics fun: it turns out that the inverse square law for electromagnetism and gravity is not true for spheres getting close to each other. http://aleph.se/andart2/physics/when-the-inverse-square-stops-working/ …
-
Show this thread
-
The EM case, described by John Lekner happens because charges move in response to the field from the other sphere, creating a polarization that can even make equally charged spheres attract each other! https://royalsocietypublishing.org/doi/10.1098/rspa.2012.0133 …https://www.nature.com/news/like-attracts-like-1.10698 …
1 reply 1 retweet 3 likesShow this thread -
The gravitational case happens because the spheres deform into ellipsoids and hence have parts closer to each other than they "should" be.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 likeShow this thread -
One might complain that for perfectly rigid spheres this is not an issue but real material spheres are not rigid. Planets and moons largely behave like liquid droplets. In special and general relativity perfectly rigid objects are not even allowed (would have speed of sound >c).
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
In fact, even defining something like rigid bodies in relativity is fraught. Every point in a rigid body is supposed to remain at the same distance from every other point, but when the body moves (especially when it rotates) this fails. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Born_rigidity …
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
For really strong gravitational fields the distance to the body gets affected by spacetime curvature, further confusing things. In black hole potentials behave as if one measured the distance in the inverse square law to the event horizon surface, not the geometric centre.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likesShow this thread -
Of course, black holes getting close to each other are also distorted. The tricky thing is that measuring how much depends on *when* you measure: depending on which spacetime slice you use you will get different answers.https://youtu.be/Y1M-AbWIlVQ
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likesShow this thread -
Replying to @anderssandberg
I've always wondered if six black holes could come together and form a cube. Could you isolate a region of space from the universe that way? Any strange properties?
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @kleptid
Yes, something strange would happen: the horizons would spread *faster than light* to encode the region, which would be inside the new big black hole (and its contents presumably eaten by the new singularity). The reason is the topological censorship theorem.
1 reply 0 retweets 1 like -
Replying to @anderssandberg @kleptid
The topological censorship theorem basically says that spacetime geometry doesn't allow paths that cannot be continuously distorted to paths from the infinite past to the infinite future infinitely far away. Very annoying! https://arxiv.org/abs/gr-qc/9305017 …
2 replies 0 retweets 3 likes
Great. Just what we need now. More bad news. 


-
-
Replying to @primalpoly @kleptid
Pandemic protection in universes with closed timelike curves is *way* messier than in universes with a globally hyperbolic foliation. You can get transmission from the future or past.
0 replies 0 retweets 1 likeThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.