The first example seems to be purely hypothetical.
Politicians in an honest democracy: 'The tradeoffs are heartbreaking, but we're about 65% sure that policy X is best for now. If Y or Z change, X will change.' In a dishonest democracy: 'It's 100% obvious that you have a RIGHT to policy X, and there are no tradeoffs.'https://twitter.com/EPoe187/status/1240250853552009218 …
-
-
-
Honest democracies are entirely hypothetical.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
most people, including most politicians, are innumerate. They do not reason like that, they are incapable of reasoning like that, and we have a ton of proof that's the case in various sectors, and you know that very well.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what poor preparedness and planning looks like. Social distancing-good. Ppl who can -working from home-good. Policy makers panicking and last minute decision making-bad A complete haunt/shut down of the economy-bad
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.