Before this year, what % of professional investors (at banks, pensions, hedge funds, etc) spent more than an hour in total seriously considering how a global pandemic might affect the economy?
-
-
It's not in the ALM models as far as I know. Haven't done it for quite a, while so it might be after 2008.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pandemic has forever been by far my leading concern regarding things that could cripple civilization. Orders of magnitude more risk of this that the next most likely black swan.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yes, because risk modeling does not care about the source, only that there’s always risk.
-
Some risks undergo exponential growth if they hit; others don't. Some risks can infect political leaders and impose continuity-of-governance issues & geopolitical instability; others don't. That seems worth modeling?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
You cannot model something that has a random chance of occurring, particularly when you have scant data on the rate of global pandemics. This could’ve just as easily happened 10 or 25 years from now as this year.
-
Risk modeling, by definition, involves modeling things that have a random chance of occurring. The question is, what chance, with what degree of uncertainty, and with what likely effects?
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I don't know how you would ever look at the previous instances and forecast this level of insane panic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pension funds ignore everything
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.