Geoffrey MillerVerified account

This of course depends on the definition of gender being used. There are many wildly different ones in circulation at the moment.

I am aware of gender-non-conforming behaviour & the relative commonness of statistical outliers, because I am one - a gay woman, very large & strong (6’1” & 200lb), with precisely zero interest in babies, dolls, or gossip as a child. [2]

Thanks for clarifying!

I'm wary of attempts to disassociate gender (interests & aptitudes) from sex (biology) entirely, although in the context of Britain's Great Post-Brexit Tr*ns Looniness, I understand why doing so is rhetorically effective.

Me too, and I tend to prefer the definition of gender you also use, i.e., sex-related behaviors, personalities, and preferences. There's good evidence these average differences have a basis in biology, which isn't to say everyone conforms to them.

What a perfect figure! Saved for the future. Thanks!