That’s a strange new way of looking at it, but somehow it makes sense. A space satisfying these conditions would feel hollistic
Two good criteria for architecture: 1) would lovers be delighted to propose marriage in or near the building? 2) would kids be delighted to play in or near the building? If not, the building is anti-romance, anti-natalist, & anti-human.https://twitter.com/acrimonyand/status/1234107851783778304 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Sir Roger Scruton wrote extensively about this. - ‘Put usefulness first and you will lose it. Put beauty first and what you will do will be useful forever.’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A lot of malls are pretty well built inside. The one in Stranger Things for example is very coolpic.twitter.com/hFu1RDQq0c
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
It is very encouraging to hear Left-friends expressing their desire to resurrect beauty and tradition in architecture.pic.twitter.com/pKtv5Cnqrp
-
That picture is so beautiful, I'm not paying attention to any of the words surrounding it ;)
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I’ll take it you recently got married and are thinking about kids
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm kinda partial to the criterion that they don't readily fall down.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There's an argument to be made for keeping *some* ugly buildings around. They make the others look even better by comparison.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.