You didn't read the paper's abstract did you.
Religion: 'if you don't believe in our specific god(s) & rules, you'll have no moral compass at all' Human nature: 'hello?'https://twitter.com/DegenRolf/status/1232205914976985088 …
-
New conversation
-
-
-
Where this really gets interesting is when they try to make laws that go against nature
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
Reminds me of Sam Harris/Jordan Peterson debates. Both were mostly right. Harris was right: U don't need religion to live a moral life, and JP was right that a religious narrative is compelling, which can make it easier for most people to live a moral life. Sam's way is harder.
-
Allowing for objective morality compels one to religion, otherwise it’s incoherent.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The book Blueprint by
@NAChristakis is very relevant to this discussion!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Humans are driven by instincts and acquired reflexes. The smart ones also use logic. Religion is for those who have defective instincts and reflexes and no logic.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
No, religion merely takes all credit for good behavior.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“For when Gentiles, who do not have the law, by nature do what the law requires, they are a law to themselves, even though they do not have the law. They show that the work of the law is written on their hearts” (Rom. 2:14-15)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.