So we have an absolute ceiling on our ability to assess an individual’s genetic fitness from either their current performance or from their genome and we know that the potential ability to do this is extremely low, far too low to be useful for selective breeding. 10/n
-
-
Indeed. As
@Evolutionistrue says artificial selection will work if a trait has any positive heritability. Which is the case for all complex traits. https://whyevolutionistrue.wordpress.com/2020/02/16/dawkins-makes-a-tweet/ …pic.twitter.com/NNFvethjZG
-
But again, this all pre-supposes we know which traits to choose. We may be able to grow taller, or more “Aryan master-race” people, but we don’t know that selecting for these same traits won’t lead to us all being susceptible to a new strain of ‘flu, or more prone to alzheimers.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I am searching for where any of this argues against sexual selection. Eugenics is planned selection for arbitrarily chosen traits. Sexual selection searches vast phenotypic space for signals of current fitness. One is pseudorational, the other empirical.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
An enlightening thread, but it seemed to me that "eliminate" as a goal is unattainable in most fields even with widespread agreement that whatever is being eliminated is undesirable. And what does "work" mean in this context? Different things to different people, surely?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
To counter the anti-eugenists, that is to say those who oppose research, we should attack the fact that before the 19th century, man could not fly. Eugenics is a technical and technological challenge. But it is theoretically valid.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
U seemed to have missed the whole point. Sexual selection is a naturally-occurring process which plays-out over 10,000s of years & upon which natural selection acts as a brake. The “traits” selected by eugenicists are arbitrary & have unknown effects our species genetic fitness.
-
Also, we aren’t animals. We have intelligence and civilization. Even if we make choices based on reproductive impulses, the criteria we use to choose mates are no longer solely based on phenotypic characteristics or behavior. Why else would anyone marry Trump?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.