It’s one thing to deplore eugenics on ideological, political, moral grounds. It’s quite another to conclude that it wouldn’t work in practice. Of course it would. It works for cows, horses, pigs, dogs & roses. Why on earth wouldn’t it work for humans? Facts ignore ideology.
-
-
Paper on mismeasuring "good genes" in TREE:https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169534719303416 …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Tay-Sachs has been virtually eliminated in the Ashkenazy Jews population by avoiding reproduction between carriers.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
By the standards of mid-century Virginia and Nazi Germany, choosers prefer "dysgenic" males much of the time. And contemporary eugenics in the scientific sense - "good genes" - is a minor player in the evolution of mate choice.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.