the newspaper isn't embracing this position. any more than nyt embraces all the op-eds it runs.
-
-
-
The Guardian had repeatedly published anti-natalist, pro-extinction articles. It's a consistent theme. It's their endgame.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
“With us gone, I believe ecosystems will be restored and there will be enough of everything. No more fighting over resources.” - this guy has clearly never watched a nature documentary
-
Indeed. He says "I can imagine what a magnificent world it would be – provided we go soon enough." But without intelligence to appreciate it it's not magnificent. It's nothing. Magnificent is a human concept.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Yet the authors never lead by example to remove themselves from@the equation.
-
“The answer to anyone who talks about the surplus population is to ask him whether he is the surplus population; or if he is not, how he knows he is not.” G.K. Chesterton
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Human imagination is inherently static--we imagine peace, prosperity, and utopias in pictorial forms, free of grime, frailty, or evil. Since humans are dynamic, messy, violent, and boisterous, utopia req's the elimination of humanity. Progresse thought thus tends always this way.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A sick fuck.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because the believe in the romantic ideal of the "Noble Savage" and still believe in the Christian idea that humans are separate from nature
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.