Recently, we received a letter from historians offering critiques of the #1619Project & requesting corrections. We welcome feedback, so today we’re publishing the letter (in print 12/29), w/ an explanation of why we disagree that corrections are warrantedhttps://www.nytimes.com/2019/12/20/magazine/letter-to-the-editor-historians-critique-the-1619-project-and-we-respond.html …
If you welcome feedback and engagement, why is the letter behind a paywall? Way to monetize your own critics.
-
-
Not a paywall, I logged in with my google account and read it for free.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.