Serious question: Why do sociologists consider inequality more interesting than equality? Equality is less likely to occur by random chance so in a way it's more anomalous and surprising.
Show this thread
-
-
Most of them do understand statistics, genetics is not their field of expertise. There is just a moral premise, that inequality is a problem that needs to be solved. Comes mostly from an understanding of naturalistic fallacy.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
They certainly don't know anything about evolution. Look at a undergraduate sociology textbook, it is as if evolution isn't a thing, or somehow hominins would be exempt from it's effects. For even more fun use the word hominin we speaking with a sociologist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.