Could we please earmark 1% of this $100bn for adversarial research to do the control experiments that would (with high probability) show ML barely works, and when it does it’s for easily understood, boring reasons?https://twitter.com/robinhanson/status/1195359574762483713 …
Machine learning already includes 'adversarial machine learning', FWIW. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Adversarial_machine_learning …
-
-
Yes; not what I had in mind. That’s a powerful technique, but not an adversarial research program.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.