Cincinnati
I'm a scientist from Ohio. If this headline was accurate, I'd be concerned. But it seems to misrepresent the bill's intent, language, and effect. Anyone have more objective info on this issue?https://www.newsweek.com/ohio-student-religious-liberties-act-1472008 …
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
-
-
That's not my reading at all.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
In my limited understanding of the language if the student can make a coherent argument against the scientific lesson (ex, evolution), using religious teachings, they cannot be penalized. If you can do that you understand the scientific concept well enough for grade school
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Not sure it's objective in the way you are seeking, but this seems reasonable to me:https://centerforinquiry.org/press_releases/educational-anarchy-cfi-blasts-ohio-bill-saying-students-religious-beliefs-trump-reality/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
"Assignment grades and scores shall be calculated using ordinary academic standards of substance and relevance,including any legitimate pedagogical concerns, and shall not penalize or reward a student based on the religious content of a student's work."
-
So, "Darwin was wrong because I'm Baptist" could just be given an F since the "Darwin was wrong" part can be marked according to "legitimate pedagogical concerns". A moral panic.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.