You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
As I said, I think sex-induced bonds crowd each other out. That's not quite the same as zero sum, but has the relevant effects here. Even if we can sustain more than one sex relation, they will each be weaker than they otherwise would be if exclusive.
I'm just not convinced that exclusivity typically makes for stronger relationships, at least not across all the distributions of individual differences traits. Poly couples _can_, sometimes, have forms of connection and honesty that monogamist couples often can't imagine.
My claims are about typical humans, not all possible humans in all possible situations. My claim that having sex with A typically cuts the emotional strength of bond to B who you also have sex with, seems really obvious averaging over the many ordinary folks that I've known.
This strikes me as a major consideration and one open to empirical eval. Prob hard to run a good RCT but if they're good methods to measure emotional intimacy in #psychology lit then could find couples that are newly non-exclusive and track changes as they have sex with others.
My $0.02: Poly can work in some cases, sure. But how do you handle kids? It's hard enough when a pair separate, but what do you do with a 'thruple' who separate? Throw in an adopted child, and it gets messy real fast. A contract (re: marriage) between two is easier than three.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
