It is a very Trumpian turn to sidestep the rather unambiguous ethics of a situation to take refuge in the legality of it.https://www.huffpost.com/entry/katie-hill-not-accused-of-crime-but-may-be-victim_n_5db214cae4b00448c945c59e …
-
I mean, not to sidestep your question, but this has nothing to do with me. Relationships with Hill staff violates congressional ethics rules.
You said we should focus on the actual ethics, not the legalities. House 'ethics rules' are legalities.
-
-
By ethics I was referring to congressional ethics rules, not the nature of morality. The former is cut and dried.
-
tfw you defer to the state's interpretation of ethics, rather than critique them
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.