How do you define it?
Every civilization, sooner or later, somehow or other, has to make peace with hypergamy.
-
-
-
Being sexually attracted to people who have more dominance, status, prestige, power, money, and/or charisma than you do.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
Which norms? Roman? Medieval? Puritan? Victorian? 1950s?
End of conversation
-
-
-
Why would it be any other way? Without hypergamy there would be no competitive drive among men to outdo their equal. Without competition, there is no civilization or technology, only mongoloids hiding in trees.
-
Bingo. We're in an awkward phase right now. We know just enough to make air conditioning and say we're no longer animals, but don't know enough about ourselves to really, truly know what of our natures should be accepted and what should be overcome.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
Do we also give men a pass on the behaviors that aren't as civilized as we like, or are we holding men to a higher standard? Is civilization helped or harmed by these behaviors? Maybe they're the reason it exists at all. Long term, what's beneficial? So many questions.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
What do you mean with that?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If you place men a step above women, then every man will be considered attractive for female hypergamia and monogamy can be developed. So civilization needs inequality. Makes sense for you?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.