Meta-analysis of sex differences in humor output, by my former PhD student & collaborator @Giligg & colleagues. (36 effect sizes from 28 studies published 1976-2018, total N=5,057).https://twitter.com/PsychoSchmitt/status/1187491535010615298 …
-
-
-
Curtosis, otra vez más. Nos fijamos en un extremo de la distribución (el extremo que sea, la distribución que sea), y siempre encontramos más hombres que mujeres. Long known.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
When are we going to start doing cross cultural studies? This limitation means that we don't know the meaning of this difference. I dont know what to do with this information sans an attempt to eliminate cultural gender differences.pic.twitter.com/642xoo5FfT
-
Not a dig a authors. Just the state of the literature.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
@meistrephilipos deve te interessar!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
We... we have a word for "humor output". Why can't science papers use words? I guess the joke's on us.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This explains Kathy Griffin.
#NotFunnyThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.