Gabbard is vile; in some ways the best strategy is to ignore her. But 2016 election was multi-prong attack that involved not just attacking Clinton but bolstering candidates like Stein who undeniably played spoiler role. We ignore possibility of that repeating itself at our peril
-
-
She’s vile to War Inc and
@TheDemocrats because she, like Trump, is against US’s#endless wars in the Middle East. And War Inc will attack you relentlessly if you threaten their profit$ with talk of withdrawal. -
Never mind that she thinks Assad is great. Cozies up to Putin. Neither one is particularly friendly to human rights. You can judge a person pretty well by the company they keep.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Because it's the new cool thing to say. Duh!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think because some republicans like me like her which means she isn't progressive enough.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
CIA agent ladies and gentlemen ^^^
End of conversation
-
-
-
Because the swamp....
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Because she justifies pogroms!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
A totally bullshit article that has been debunked many times. Do some weekend reading of something other than anti-Tulsi propaganda.
End of conversation
New conversation
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.