PS I'm making a general game-theoretic point about the importance of discretion and security in diplomatic communication, not commenting either way on any particular current events.
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't think the players involved are thinking of the long term, more consequential implications. It's just "win now", at any cost.
-
It would be nice if politicians could think seven generations ahead. Or even past 2050.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Have you thought about any possible downsides to the rhetoric you use?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
The only one threatening war right now is the president.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a nerdtastically pedantic and thoroughly misguided point to be making at this time particular time in history.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Only when there's reasonable evidence of self-dealing. Is this what you want to be hidden?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is a courtesy you extend to heads of state who are deserving of it, Geoffrey. It’s not hard to see that Trump has abused it. I’m with you in wanting socially-beneficial policy, but this is not a battle I’d want to be fighting.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
For the most part, it seems like what people who are fans of politics want. They say they don't, but their preference falsification rears its ugly head every time a shibboleth is threatened.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.