UK biobank seems pretty accessible. Could that be a template for how to do it right?
This is true. It's incredibly hard for researchers to get access to many federal data sets that were funded by taxpayers -- it's often months of red tape, bad data documentation, poor quality control. #freethedatahttps://twitter.com/AndrewYang/status/1178458276524109824 …
-
-
- End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This is what a candidate who is focused on identifying problems and solving them sounds like. Refreshing isn't it?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The bureaucracy wants it that way. Remove the job protections for civil servants and this could be changed quite quickly, but his party will never support that.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I'm guessing it often costs more to make it public and tidy, versus minimum-needed per internal job. Just like almost any work process.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Yang identifies problem created by government. Yang’s solution? More government.
-
How is removing layers of bureaucracy and red tape to access data 'more gov't'? Hint: it's not.
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
How about professional journals? Publicly funded research grants produce results that are then published in those journals. Unless you have an (expensive) institutional subscription, you can't read them.
-
If you ask the author, you can usually get a link to a non-paywalled copy. There are other workarounds, too (library accounts, etc.), but it's clear that open source will prevail, too bad for the economics of scientific publishing houses. I will not mourn their passing.
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.