At age 16, I despaired about the risk of global thermonuclear war. I was right to worry. It was a real risk; adults weren't on top of it; & it's blind luck we're still here. But not everything teens worry about proves to be as catastrophic as they think.
-
-
Thinking in terms of converging catastrophes, couldn't a changing climate make conflict & the risk of nuclear war even more likely?
-
Maybe. But lots of other things could make a nuclear war more likely, and they're not getting as much attention.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Agreed but it would be more correct to say that the probability of climate change causing human extinction is too low. I agree because all technological interventions would have to fail not because I know what experts estimate the probability of runaway climate change to be.
-
When you're dealing with such stakes statistical probabilities aren't the only factor, no? I concur that its unlikely to cause human extinction, but billions of casualties? There are several ways for this to happen as a consequence of climate change, most likely world wars
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Climate change is not an X-risk for (the abstract notion of) humanity (just for some real, mostly poor, humans)... its more like aids, making other X-risks far more likely
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.