The real problem with Chick-fil-A isn't their politics. The problem is that, given factory farming, eating chicken imposes more far more suffering on other sentient animals, pound for pound, than eating beef. (Chickens are much smaller than cows, & suffer more.)
-
-
So they’re better off never existing? The slaughter process is quite humane (I know this)it’s their lives. Be born or not ?
-
Would you have kids if you knew with 100 percent certainty that they all get slaughtered at age 3?
- 5 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
On others? Good to know that chickens are valued, but at what point do u draw the line? U would c a human (chickens are the largest consumable meat in the world) not eat than disturb a chicken?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Your definition of a particular being’s suffering is subjective. Free markets tend to work for a reason and the savagery of nature is neither good or bad.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Do animals impose suffering on other animals? If we are meat eaters, how much ‘calculation’ needs to happen to justify a choice?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.