Warren the candidate endorses simpleminded extreme positions, but decades ago it is clear that Warren the academic very much knew better. Does this fact suggest she is more or less likely to support reasonable policies if elected, relative to a candidate who never knew better?
I thought Warren's academic research had been strongly criticized as simplistic, ideologically driven, and empirically weak? e.g.https://www.theatlantic.com/business/archive/2009/06/why-elizabeth-warrens-new-bankruptcy-study-is-so-bad/18835/ …
-
-
That study was from during her transition to being more ideological
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.