You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Is it ethical to deny qualified applicants the opportunity based on your evaluation of their job prospects? What if some bureaucrat tried to do that?
Medical schools do this all they time; they consider it unethical to train more doctors than there are positions for doctors.
In fact, guild-like, they throttle supply
I'm interested in the game theory here. If they allow anyone to be trained who passes the threshold, some people don't get jobs, or they compete down wages for everyone, thus fewer people apply to medical school, which is a long (10yr) investment, and the school shuttering.
I'm not convinced this supply restriction is a question of ethics. And as a lay person, it seems like a market distortion that doesn't lead to better health. Very interesting question to ponder.
Meanwhile there's a shortage of doctors or you get substandard doctors in places that don't have any choice. Is there a shortage of tenure track English faculty?https://news.aamc.org/press-releases/article/2019-workforce-projections-update/ …
Not in India, here the position is about lack of doctors, whereas the real problem is lack of access
These “centralized planners” set up a manufacturing-like business cycle: some years you have good inventory to meet demand while other years, not enough. They need to let communities (I.e. “customers”) make the forecast. Better yet, revamp the “assembly” process, like Dell did
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
