aero dynamics way more optimal nowadays + obsessive optimization of fuel costs etc. + airbags & shock absorbers change a lot. Current design is breakable on purpose to absorb the shock in the structure rather than into human. Maybe not compatible w bumbers
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Safety Crash design realized you want a car crumple upon impact, not stay intact. (Which then became legislated) Also design of hood and numbers are now regulated to protect pedestrians in crashes
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
My recollection is that they were phased out when auto companies began building cars that were more ductile, from and back, and that could take a minor bump without doing or suffering damage.
-
I think it was all about fuel economy and reducing weight.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
In addition to what was saud above they probably weighed a lot which also meant increased fuel consumption.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Asking this very question this morning when I bumped the tire on my son's car and did about $1500 damage to my "bumper". (If only I didn't have 40 years of using mirrors instead of cameras...sigh...)
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hmm in my language we don't have different word-the plastic things that came in their place are still called the same. Tho now that you point it out I see how the effect couldn't be more different.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
This really gets my noggin’ joggin’
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.