The whole article is about how geoengineering can address a limited subset of climate change issues and how the researchers themselves are mostly ambivalent about it but feel an urgency to do something. Why oversell it as a solution?
If you actually want to solve climate change, this is how you solve climate change.https://twitter.com/techreview/status/1161372719524564992 …
0:04
-
-
-
The other solutions tend to slow economic growth, which holds hundreds of millions of people back in poverty, and that's deeply unethical, as
@tylercowen argues in this book:https://www.amazon.com/gp/product/B07G9DFC8W/ … - 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Planting trees looks somewhat safer to me.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
There is no proof that a reduction of global temperatures will reverse climate changing trends or halt them. They will continue to change and we will continue to adapt to it through localized engineering.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Until you freeze to death.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Nah just TAX THE RICH
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Government-sanctioned Ice age and obliteration of crops and livestock in 10... 9... 8...
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
CO2 is ironically more natural and predictable than the aerosols they want to inject into the atmosphere. The only sensible solution is more trees + nuclear.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.