You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
I will talk with brutal dictators anywhere in the world if I can prevent one of my brother and sisters in uniform from dying on foreign soil in senseless regime change wars. The only alternative to diplomacy is war. #TULSI2020pic.twitter.com/yGE9QwH1bK
Why do so few Democratic candidates disavow 'regime change' wars? Why don't they join Tulsi in standing against neocon interventionism? Why doesn't mainstream media challenge them on this central issue?
why should anyone negotiate with a regime which massacres its citizens like the Assad regime has done? It's far better to try and isolate them and topple them in the long run.
You didn't even watch her two minute speech did you.
Because Trump is anti-interventionist, so by default the Democrat has to be anti-anti-interventionist, and the power grab by Pelosi-Clinton-hawks got unsurprisingly even firmer, because their left-wing challengers base is concerned with their "bourgeois narcissism" (Nagle).
Corruption, incompetence, and complicity, respectively.
Because her meeting with assad and refusal to condemn him is bizarre and people assume she's compromised. I agree with her right down the line until she's asked about Assad and she shoots herself in the foot every time.
And she lies about Libya, trying to convince people the U.S. and Obama had a regime change policy there. Completely unfactual.
Mainstream media are puppets in the hands of the deep state & military industrial complex.
They’re too busy accusing her of being a Russian ally
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.
