A checkmark with 290k followers wants to 'eradicate' all 62 million Americans who voted for POTUS.https://twitter.com/rezaaslan/status/1158160628592209920 …
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly
You of all people should know about the motivated reasoning that occurs when you read things from people you don't like... To readers without your priors, it is pretty obvious that Reza was referring to white nationalism as the scourge to be eradicated.
8 replies 1 retweet 24 likes -
Replying to @Miles_Brundage @primalpoly
He literally called all supporters of Trump white nationalists. Ergo, roughly half of the population.
1 reply 0 retweets 3 likes -
Replying to @vzeman79 @primalpoly
I read the tweet as well! But it is a big step from "there is a bad thing in society and many people are contributing to it" to "eliminate these people." Whereas there is a huge segment of society that says "eliminate these people" and some of them massacred ppl this week,
2 replies 0 retweets 0 likes -
...and rightly, many people are wondering what can be done to stop that--and one doesn't have to look hard to find such explicit hate and genocidal language--Reza's tweet was no such thing and this quote-tweet seemed miscalibrated, so I said so.
1 reply 0 retweets 0 likes -
Replying to @Miles_Brundage @primalpoly
Your reading skills are zero or you are deliberately misinterpreting a very clear statement from Aslan.
1 reply 0 retweets 4 likes -
Replying to @vzeman79 @primalpoly
If you seriously are worried about Reza Azlan inciting violence then I think you have your priorities super out of whack, but I'll keep talking to you if you tell me that is genuinely what you think.
11 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Miles_Brundage @vzeman79
Reza is obviously inciting violence, IMHO. Feel free to unfollow me if you're OK with him doing so.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @vzeman79
Not sure why you jumped to the unfollow thing, seems irrelevant to the matter at hand. So, "obviously", "inciting," "violence" - you think that Reza intents (inciting) to cause violence to occur to...random Trump supporters? What exactly?
2 replies 0 retweets 1 like -
And did you consider the other interpretation of the sentence (in which he is "obviously" referring to the need for social change to eliminate white nationalism)? Why does that seem implausible to you as an interpretation?
3 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
Because I've read his other tweets. He clearly shows homicidal rage against Trump supporters and wants them to suffer violence.
-
-
Replying to @primalpoly @vzeman79
So, if "clearly" and "obviously" are the relevant evidence here for both sides, clearly we won't make much progress in this discussion, unfortunately, which is sad, because I appreciate you replying. But we have super different priors here.
4 replies 0 retweets 2 likes -
Replying to @Miles_Brundage @vzeman79
I respect your rationality and attempt to be constructive here. But we do have very different priors about Reza's rhetoric and what it means. We might have to agree to disagree -- while I hope still agreeing that the AGI alignment problem is 1000x more important than all this.
0 replies 0 retweets 2 likes
End of conversation
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.