For more on this 'regression dilution' effect and correction for attenuation, which Taleb sadly didn't bother to understand before making this embarrassing blunder, see: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Regression_dilution … https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Correction_for_attenuation …
-
-
Show this threadThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Be prepared to join the group of people he calls idiots.
-
I've been in that group for the last several months, based on me understanding intelligence research and Taleb not understanding intelligence research.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
He's a fraud and a hypocritehttps://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1156749156603461634?s=20 …
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I THINK YOU GUYS NEED TO STEP BACK AND START FROM FIRST PRINCIPLES
-
The first principles are called psychometric principles, which anybody commenting on psychometrics should try to understand.
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
I tried listening to a podcast where when claims GMOs are bad because "precautionary principal.". It was nonsense. Just because he correctly called the 2008 collapse doesn't mean he is well versed beyond market behavior.
-
You are giving him too much credit about knowing market behavior. He was right a couple of times, but eventually closed shop, stopped trading and began flaneuring. Not enough data.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He is indeed correct that I don't get that. What does it mean to not know a point on a distribution with x% uncertainty? Where did he pull the oddly specific number 34% from. Lolpic.twitter.com/X1t6Gt4PJY
-
Half 1 sigma is 34 percent
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.