Woman plans to marry 91-year-old chandelier named Lumiere https://trib.al/0AkEnIl pic.twitter.com/L0WpQLPeOz
This is one of those sexual things that seems really weird to most people, but it imposes no costs on anybody else, so shouldn't be anybody else's concern -- whether the press or the gov't. That's my libertarian take, anyway.
-
-
It’s weird how libertarians so often seem to assume that there’s a question of legality/rights/enforcement whenever people talk about disapproving of behaviors or beliefs. It’s important for her to be free to love her chandelier, and it’s important for society to call her a loon
-
Why exactly is it important for society to call her a loon?
- 2 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
just wait until that chandelier demands social security
-
Or alimony when they divorce
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
"Imposes no costs on anyone else" ...except the baker who gets sued for refusing to bake the wedding cake.
End of conversation
-
-
-
As a libertarian take, seems legit. As a reality take, not so much.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
I didn't get that memo.
End of conversation
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.