I think we drifted a little from the original point, That being- a significant number of men won’t listen to a woman’s ideas unless she’s attractive (Dalai Lama’s sentiments). I objected, and have more faith in men in general. Hope I’m right
How exactly would you convince people to take men with power no more seriously than men without power??https://twitter.com/aliamjadrizvi/status/1145207939269087232 …
-
-
-
My experience is that men may be attracted to beautiful women, but tend to take them *less* seriously -- especially in a professional setting.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
Being taken seriously is the definition of power. The logic of the tweet therefore recommends we take *no* men seriously.
-
Power = joules per second
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
He is going to re-write the genetic code of humanity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
That's easy for me lol having power and money means nothing to me. We grew up with it, around it, still live near it. The closer you get to who other people see as special the more quickly you realize they aren't. Nobody deserves a pedestal
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
@aliamjadrizvi@Emmyjewel Threaten to punish them if they don't!Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I think he conflated two very different issues. People with power have more exposure because their success facilitates larger platforms and isolation from the masses. If we all listed the most intellectual women we know, it won't be a list of supermodels.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Redistribution of power. It all makes sense.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.