Public humiliation and ostracism were typical tactics in Maoist China.
The NY Times argues for doxxing all border agents.https://twitter.com/allahpundit/status/1144972753554030592 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Well, that’s doxxing. The NY Times should not have printed this. People will get hurt.
-
This is when newpapers open themselves up to lawsuits. It’s grossly irresponsible. It also sets others up for behavior in kind. Hard to believe they are this stupid.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
If he wrote "this is why it's morally right to doxx them" it would be an argument. But writing "this is not an argument for doxxing" is a blatant, immediate lie. Shame on them.
-
Exactly. I agree with the explicit position and would argue it's reasonable. But why lie about it? You can't call for doxxing while saying it's not doxxing because it's effective and for a good cause.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The morally accurate move
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The level of hysteria these days must be a gift to social scientists. Id feel like a kid in a candy store as a psychologist.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
But they say it’s not an argument for doxxing!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.