Thanks, this is a helpful thread.
Remember that whole Notre Dame fire thing? Did the French ever figure out whether it was arson, and if so, are they delaying releasing the report about it being arson, and if so, why?pic.twitter.com/lY5VeXqbrP
-
-
-
It would be a lot more helpful if the author hadn't locked off his account...
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
No, the government decided it was an accident within about 30 mins of the building going up in flames and have released no report. The official line is that it was an electrical fault. But 800 year old Oak does not burn like that without an accelerant. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JRoilgJ4qI8 …
-
And the grid was down so the electrical fire had to have been started by magical power tools running on some divine mana emanating from the church.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
They ruled out arson moments after it happened. Didn’t even need to check it out. Wasn’t arson because they decided it wasn’t arson. Nevermind that the fire started in two separate places. Total coincidence there. What a glitch.
-
Just throwing this out there; could they be saying “accident” to counter any group claiming responsibility and getting credit? A sort of counter-psyop?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Nope, seems to be some classic bureaucratic clusterfuck
-
However, given that conspiracy theories are essentially impossible to falsify, we will continue to hear about them more or less for ever.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Cathedral roofs have caught on fire for centuries. There's nothing unusual about this
-
The wood used in the cathedral is as hard as rock. It can’t just “catch fire.”
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.