These are no longer scientific organizations. They exist to push ideology at the expense of truth.
An egregious case of political bias in science's leading journal, @sciencemagazine.
They published a tiny earlier study claiming conservatives are more physiologically reactive to threats than liberals. New much bigger study says nope. Science rejects it without peer review.https://twitter.com/bnbakker/status/1140954856280285186 …
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Ah nice to see
@VinArceneaux! One of my PhD mentors, the man who taught me stats ;-)Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don’t. Ecessarily think it is political bias. I think it is the business as usual not publishing null replications that the reform movement has complained about for years. It happens to be politically relevant here. But the same was for non rep of Bem’s ESP
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
If that isn't bad enough, I found a recent thesis from @Waterloo in Canada that uses inductive reasoning to pursue a case *against* established science. That's another "Ph.D." lose in the world who can't separate fact from comfortable fictions!
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.