So far, yes, as far as I know. @sentientist would know more about that, since she studies disgust.
-
-
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
It’s almost as if the profession purged nearly every conservative from the field and then ended up generating smear-studies about their jettisoned political opponents as a result of confirmation bias.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Hard to have much faith in widely publicized psych studies. Especially whenever they coincide with a political narrative.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
It worries me that
@sciencemagazine denied publication as this gets at the heart of the replication crisis, and also how influential the original study has been. It smacks of politics rather than science. -
I am an
@AAASmember and these grounds for rejection are deeply troubling given the profound impact of the original study on public discourse.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
A conservative stays on 16 vs 7 A liberal hits on 16 vs 7 A centrist surrenders
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I recently saw a reference to some research trying to correlate personality traits and political stances. I looked up the actual paper. Problems with it were evident just from the abstract.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
-
-
&Science, the flagship of the American Association for the Advancement of Science, published the small quantity limited locale data set paper saying conservatives are risk averse, but rejects the more statistically significant refutation. One might suspect a narrative bias.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.