I did not look at the paper, but cited blog confuses "regularly cycling women" with "ovulating women". I wish evol. psychologists read papers on ovarian function (yes, knowledge about cycle should not come from a textbook) by P. Ellison and other reprod. ecologists.
Women at peak fertility (around ovulation) show increased sexual interest in both primary partners and other potential partners. Results from largest cycle study ever done, by @LarsPenke lab.https://twitter.com/NicoleBarbaro/status/1139371023030075395 …
-
-
-
I believe they confirmed ovulation timing with LH surge measures from saliva samples. What exactly is your critique here?
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
We did not do LH tests (in this study). But we also didn't say ovulating women, we used "naturally cycling women". "Natural": unfortunate connotation of regularly cycling being the natural thing (as opposed to breastfeeding/pregnancy). "Regularly": HC users cycle regularly too >
-
"women not using HC": unwieldy and would include postmenopausal/breastfeeding/pregnancy. So, I might stay with "naturally cycling" and explain in text. Happy to change my view though!
- 3 more replies
New conversation -
-
-
Odd that women’s preference for their partner on the pill remains constant, but preference on the pill for other potential partners changes
-
Makes me think one of the lines is misreported
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
This Tweet is unavailable.
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.