Good article. Thoroughly dismantles faddish beliefs about human sexuality, fairness and power. But there’s a critique worth raising: the only thing mundane about missionary position is the term. Face to face sex is emotionally high stakes. We’d be wise to rename it accordingly.https://twitter.com/clairlemon/status/1136729749521281025 …
-
-
Replying to @BretWeinstein
Just call it 'pair-bond position', given that it's what pair-bonded humans tend to do, and the eye contact tends to strengthen the pair bond.
3 replies 1 retweet 74 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @BretWeinstein
You just improbably accomplished making the term less sexy
2 replies 0 retweets 18 likes -
Replying to @Ruminorang @BretWeinstein
There are few words less sexy than 'missionary'
3 replies 0 retweets 12 likes -
Replying to @primalpoly @BretWeinstein
I’d argue this is wrong because humans make every unsexy category of woman into “naughty [fill in the blank]” Look at how much naughty nun porn there is Naughty pair-bonder doesn’t work for me
1 reply 0 retweets 6 likes -
Yeah. You guys ought to consult poets for this kind of thing. Even if they couldn’t agree on a term, they’d have a good feel for which term might be most easily nested in a limerick.
1 reply 0 retweets 5 likes
*revises NSF sex research grant proposal to include line item for consultant poet*
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.