Something I’ve noticed: most pro-lifers understand the pro-choice arguments completely And can articulate them totally accurately. I have seen very few pro-choicers accurately portray a pro-life argument. It’s always filled with hyperbole & misinformation.
This is accurate, IMHO. There's a serious asymmetry of understanding and ethical perspective-taking.
-
-
IMO it's logic versus emotion/religion
-
You're part of the problem then.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
This thread and the original thread seem to provide evidence that that is inaccurate
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Pro-Life = rhetoric/positive spin Pro-Life is actually not pro-life at all, it is an oxymoron, an obfuscation of clarity unworthy of definition.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The conservative advantage goes some way in helping understand the gap
@JonHaidtThanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
One of the things I recommend people do is to listen to an interview of someone they disagree with (politician, pundit, etc). When they're asked a question, pause the video before they answer. Can you accurately anticipate their position? If not, that's likely a problem.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.