Some philosophies are self-terminating.https://twitter.com/NewYorker/status/1130805673908998144 …
-
-
I'm curious, why is it bad faith?. I can see how it some principles are created on circular reasoning. What about the general idea that there's more "bad" than good that awaits a newborn?
@SamHarrisOrg had a good go at Benatar. -
This Tweet is unavailable.
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I've listened to Benatar (David not Pat) explain anti-natalism on a few occasions, most notably with
@SamHarrisOrg and@jordanbpeterson. I find him wholly unconvincing and always come away thinking his relationships with other humans are either too restricted or somehow impaired.Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Needless to say, I was not impressed by either Benatar's philosophy or the economics of antinatalism.https://putanumonit.com/2018/02/08/antiantinatalism/ …
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
well, it's not as if it was ever going to work.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Axioms are not necessarily false. (I grant that what he says boils down to "If everyone were me they'd be better off childless, because I feel life sucks on balance, and there are good reasons to believe my kids would, too.")
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is there good research on genetic inheritance of low hedonic set-point (assuming there's such a thing as the latter, by that or another name)?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
He's right, but it will never take. Humans are the type of creature who can believe there's value being in hell.
- 8 more replies
New conversation -
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.