They are conflating fertility and fecundity.
-
-
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
I don't see a problem. We can have a growing economy without a growing population. More robots, more automation, more productivity.
-
That was my thought as well. Last week the screed was that AI and automation were coming to take all our jobs. Less people = less unemployed
- 1 more reply
New conversation -
-
-
I gave up on helping solve this problem because I couldn’t work out how to produce 2.1 children
-
Round up.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
The comments mostly just complain about how hard it is to raise kids...by commenters who don’t have kids
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Practically, declining birthrates don't really matter because automation/AI are going to step into a lot of currently productive human endeavors. The important question is whether it indicates a lack of confidence in the value of being, and what that says about modernity.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Outsourcing reproduction. So advanced.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
The commenters on your thread apparently see no problem and like the idea of being cared for by robots and algorithms As if the only social benefit of children and grandchildren is economic
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Woah especially the comments. Environmentalism is an anti-human cult along with every other strain of radical progressivism.pic.twitter.com/MLQJDZiR5L
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.