Anyone notice a pattern? A) Mainstream commentators decide amongst themselves that right-of-center positions are only held by a bad fringe. B) Voters then lie to pollsters in response. C) A vote is held. D) Same commentators switch to complaining about dangers of “populism”.https://twitter.com/RonNehring/status/1129710677692600321 …
-
-
Which is more likely, a large number of disparate individuals, the world over, have begun lying to pollsters OR a small number of networked pollsters have been fudging the numbers?
-
By fudging the numbers I mean they have built shared assumptions into their methodologies and created what they perceived to be best practices across the field, which have slowly made it impossible for them to take accurate polls or to self-correct.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
Some would argue that it's no sin to lie to those who will only use that information to manipulate you.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
New methods must be devised.
-
This is where prediction markets come in.
End of conversation
New conversation -
-
-
I highly doubt disparate individuals are conspiring to lie to pollsters to throw off the mainstream media. Besides, the polls (at least in US ‘16) were only off by a few points maximum. Even in Aus, it was close. No need to make such broad extrapolations from these events.
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
-
-
Is this an interesting side note or do you feel that strategic deception is a significant contributor?
Thanks. Twitter will use this to make your timeline better. UndoUndo
-
Loading seems to be taking a while.
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.