Cambridge University provides a non-response to their rationale for rescinding my fellowship invitation: I will provide the good doctor who inquired with my permission for data release.pic.twitter.com/EhoayqC6ud
You can add location information to your Tweets, such as your city or precise location, from the web and via third-party applications. You always have the option to delete your Tweet location history. Learn more
Clinical psychologists call it Cambridgesque behavior.
He does. I've suggested a Subject Access Request, which is the other way of seeking data about oneself (and, by design, the first port of call for this). Now, they're being a tad obtuse in not mentioning that, but an FoI request probably wasn't the best initial option.
I believe it was someone else making the request, and so Peterson's approval would be needed, no? And now they have it.
...dammit, Geoffrey...making me use Google again...
Jordan wasn’t the one requesting the information. It is entirely proper that access to this info was denied to the requester. If JBP himself requests it, then the situation is different.
It wasn't him making the request
It’s actually illegal for them to hold secret files on JBP and not let JBP know what’s in the file ... (er... not actually sure it’s illegal, but I thought that sounds good)
It is illegal to even aquire that information without his consent He also has the right to demand they give him or another party his information and that they delete it themselves. However, this normally applies to EU citizens, which Jordan is not
"Kafkaesque" is exactly the right word. SJWs have embraced something that Eric S. Raymond has dubbed the "Kafkatrap". I heartily recommend everyone read this. It's proven to be very helpful in understanding how they work.http://esr.ibiblio.org/?p=2122
Twitter may be over capacity or experiencing a momentary hiccup. Try again or visit Twitter Status for more information.